The point about sequencing not being objetive really resonates. Too often we see genetic studies presented as if they reveal unchangeable truths, when in reality there are so many subjctive decisions in data interpretation. The lack of a preprint here is particularly telling given the profile of the researchers involved. It makes you wonder if they're trying to control the narrative before opening it up to broader critique from the scientific comunity.
I’m glad to hear you have a similar perspective! It’s really hard to read media coverage about studies like this that don’t have a meaningful discussion about the implications of the findings. We have an obligation to acknowledge the limitations of our studies!
The point about sequencing not being objetive really resonates. Too often we see genetic studies presented as if they reveal unchangeable truths, when in reality there are so many subjctive decisions in data interpretation. The lack of a preprint here is particularly telling given the profile of the researchers involved. It makes you wonder if they're trying to control the narrative before opening it up to broader critique from the scientific comunity.
I’m glad to hear you have a similar perspective! It’s really hard to read media coverage about studies like this that don’t have a meaningful discussion about the implications of the findings. We have an obligation to acknowledge the limitations of our studies!